The Modern Kimber Rimfire

Kimber 22 Classic


For many, the name Kimber immediately conjures visions of an Oregon made, high-quality, semi-custom rimfire – the Model 82. This isn’t the case for me. The Model 82 was long gone by the time my love affair with rifles started.

Instead, my first introduction to the name Kimber came at a local sporting goods store and was in the form of a 1911 pistol. It was a beautiful handgun, but I’m not a pistol guy. I love rifles. I suppose it was my lack of experience with the original Kimber rifle that allowed me to fully appreciate their more current offering.

In 1999, the new Kimber, based in New York, and an entirely different animal from their Oregon roots, introduced a newly designed rimfire rifle. The Kimber 22 Classic, while maintaining the classic appearance of the Model 82, had an entirely redesigned action. The K22 was built with a Mauser-style bolt with full-length claw extractor and controlled-round feeding. The outstanding trigger was adjustable and factory set to break like glass at 3-3.5 lbs.

The wing safety was almost a dead-ringer for the famous safety found on the Winchester Model 70. The only difference being two positions – safe and fire – rather than the far superior three positions found on the Model 70. Kimber later realized their error and began including the 3-position safety on all models of the K22 rifle.

During the eight years of production (1999-2007), Kimber offered nine different versions of the rifle, ranging from the base model Hunter, with a clear finished walnut stock, to the SuperAmerica, with a highly polished blue metal finish and AAA-grade walnut stock with 24 LPI wrap hand-checkering and ebony forend tip.

Of the nine models produced, seven were sporters with the classic lines of a full-sized centerfire. The other two, the HS (Hunter-Silhouette) and SVT (Short Varmint/Target), were special purpose rifles, each wearing a high comb target style stock.

All K22 models had a free floated match grade barrel with a tapered match grade chamber and target crown. With the exception of the SuperAmerica, all barrels were finished in either a matte blue or satin stainless steel. All receivers were drilled and tapped for Kimber scalloped base sets and, with the exception of the SuperAmerica, were finished in a matte blue.

By 2006, Kimber was chambering four of the eight offered models for the 17 Mach 2 round. These rifles were designated as the K17. Each of these rifles, like their 22 counterparts, was tested for accuracy. Prior to being shipped, every Kimber rimfire was fired with match-grade ammunition and had to shoot a 50 yard, five-shot group, measuring .400-inch or less. The actual test target was included in the packaging.

During the time of their production, there is no question the Kimber 22 was the finest mass-produced, American-made, rimfire rifle on the market. With prices ranging from approximately $600 to $2000 depending on level of refinement, the K22 offered a “semi-custom” package at a fraction of the cost of a true semi-custom rifle.

There were and are several European-made sporters that compare well with the K22. The Sako Finnfire (now discontinued) and the Anschutz Model 1400, 1500 and 1700 series rifles are all terrific choices. I would even include the CZ 452 and 453 rifles in this group of deluxe, production-grade rimfires. Each of these rifles, however, shares a distinct European styling – even those designed specifically for the American market, like the CZ 452 & 453 American, fall short in delivering the classic lines associated with a true American sporting rifle.

Due to this lack of high-end American rimfires, there have been several articles comparing the K22 to the Cooper Firearms of Montana Model 57-M. While the K22 compares well in many ways with the Cooper 57-M (in similar versions), the Cooper is clearly a semi-custom rifle and is priced accordingly. The base model Cooper M57-M,without any custom options and stocked in AA claro walnut, matches up nicely to the K22 Classic (also stocked in AA claro walnut), but is priced nearly double what the Classic cost at the end of its production ($1,400 vs. approximately $800). A flattering comparison for Kimber, but not exactly fair.

If you don’t own a K22 and you happen to see one around, be sure to pick it up and give it a good look over. Notice the fit and finish of the parts and how the magazine sits flush with the floorplate. Make certain you test the trigger to see if it really breaks like glass at 3 lbs (it does). Don’t worry about dry-firing, the firing pin is actually centered in the bolt body so it works just like a centerfire (the receiver is drilled offset from the axis of the bore). Take note of the hand-rubbed oil finish and sharp checkering. Who knows, it just may remind you of your favorite classic centerfire.

I’m sure glad I own one…they just don’t make .22’s like that anymore.

© Copyright 2009 by the Western Rifleman. All rights reserved.

Published in: on January 12, 2009 at 6:13 pm  Comments (7)  
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

7 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. I really enjoyed your piece on the Kimbers. The only problem is you’ve really set a new “want” on fire. Winter time is really bad up here in Michigan. Not a lot to do, but now I have a purpose. To see if I can find my Kimber.

    Thank you, Jack Lee

  2. Thanks Jack. I’m glad to feed the fire! I wish you the best of luck in finding that Kimber – you won’t be disappointed. Thanks for reading, TWR

  3. I recently wanted to get a rimfire. I currently own a Kimber Montana in .338 federal. So I decided to look for a kimber rimfire. Little did I know what I was getting myself into. The rifles I did find were way out of my price range. Your article was great. I figured I could spend a little more. So I decide to bid on one on gunbroker and I won! Gunbroker
    Item #: 171502124. Check it out if you can. Can you tell what model it is by looking at it? In your opinion would you use a rifle like this
    or would you put it away? I do admit I should have asked some these questions before I bid, but I saw it and just jumped. Hope I made the right choice. Thanks Jim

  4. Thanks for reading, Jim. Congratulations on your new Kimber! I can tell you that your rifle is a Kimber 22 HS (which stands for Hunter-Silhouette). The stock on this rifle is designed specifically for Silhouette (also known as off-hand) target shooting and is not designed for benchrest shooting. In fact, it may be very difficult for you to shoot the rifle from a bench due to the high comb design of the stock. This should, however, be a great field rifle for hunting or plinking. As for shooting or storing, I’m not sure I’d be able to refrain from shooting the rifle if it were mine, so that’s where I stand. While the value may decrease slightly by shooting, as long as the rifle is properly maintained and remains in excellent condition, it should maintain its value. Enjoy that Kimber! TWR

  5. Great article. I purchased a “hunter” model several years ago. The wood is pretty good even though this was the base model. The gun is very acurate – I use it every season to keep my rifle skills up. It has also seen a good bit of use squirl hunting. It is alot cheaper to shoot than my Kimber 84 308, 8400 300WSM or Cooper Custom classic 52 270. As you can see, I am a bit of a rifle nut myself! One question, why did Kimber stop its production? I asume they simply were not selling enough units to justify the production?

  6. Thanks for reading, John. I can’t say exactly why Kimber stopped the production, but my guess is they didn’t need to anymore – and the cost to manufacture them outweighed their profitability. When the NY-based manufacturing company purchased the name rights for Kimber, the name was synonomous with high-end .22 rimfire rifles. Therefore, it was imperative that they continue with this product line until they could adequately diversify their product offerings. Let’s face it, there is a very limited market for $800-$2000 .22 rifles. Today, Kimber is far better known for the wide variety of quality, high-end 1911 pistols and centerfire rifles. There is a much larger market for these products, and I’m guessing, far more profitability. It’s unfortunate, but I think these beautiful .22 rimfires have gone the way of the dinosaur…

    I hope that answers your question – TWR

  7. TWR;

    What do you think about the Kimber LPT in .308 as a hunting rifle? I know it a tactical rifle so it’s a little heavier than my Montana, (8lbs Vs. 5lbs) but it feels so good in my hands. The stock is great and I can get a great cheek weld going. Any thoughts? My original intention was to get another Montana in .308 until I held the LPT. Thanks again. Jim

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: