The CZ 452 American in .17 HMR: A Review

cz-452

It’s amazing to think only a few years ago the name CZ would have brought blank stares at your local shooting range. How quickly things have changed. Today, CZ is widely known amongst serious shooters as a manufacturer of top quality firearms, especially rimfire rifles.

While their products were basically unknown (and unavailable) to American consumers until 1991, Ceska Zbrojovka a.s. Uhersky Brod (CZUB) has been manufacturing rimfire rifles in what is now the Czech Republic since 1936. Initially imported and distributed by firms like Bauska, Action Arms, and Magnum research, CZUB quickly realized the need to have a corporate presence in such a significant firearms market. In 1997, CZ-USA was founded in Oakhurst, California and shortly thereafter was relocated to its present location in Kansas City, Kansas.

The CZ 452 action, manufactured since the late 1940’s, was originally offered in numerous stock configurations ranging from a basic beech to full-length walnut Mannlicher. Unfortunately, most of these models shared a very distinct European styling with a rounded comb profile and thick pistol grip. Just as CZ recognized the significance of having a storefront in the U.S., they quickly realized most Americans prefer sporting rifles with classic American lines – regardless of how well the rifle shoots.

In 1999, CZ-USA launched the 452 American Classic. Chambered in .22 LR, the American Classic featured a sporter-style premium Circassien walnut stock with 18 LPI checkering, slim pistol grip, and near straight comb profile. Instead of iron sights like those found on the European models, the 452 American Classic was sold without sights and featured a full-length receiver dovetail in 3/8″ for mounting a scope. Shortly after the release, CZ dropped the moniker “Classic” and the rifle has since been known as the 452 American.

It didn’t take long for word to spread that this new rifle from CZ wasn’t just a “looker”. In the initial review by Field & Stream (12/1999), the average group from all testers and ammunition was 0.642 inches at 50 yards, with several brands of ammo turning in groups under a half-inch. Not only did the American look good, it could shoot.

Take the above at an initial street price of less than $300 (as of January 2009 it is approximately $350), and you’ve got a rimfire that can compete with rifles twice its cost.

By 2003, the 452 American had established a solid foundation for the success of CZ in the U.S. market. Meanwhile, with the introduction of new loads by Federal and CCI, it was becoming evident the hot, little .17 caliber rimfire introduced by Hornady just over a year earlier was going to be a big success. Designed around the .22 Winchester Magnum Rimfire (.22 WMR) case, the .17 Hornady Magnum Rimfire (.17 HMR) provided better velocity, trajectory, accuracy and wind-bucking ability than its predecessor.

In another excellent business decision, CZ quickly jumped on the .17 HMR bandwagon. By mid-2003, CZ 452 American rifles in .17 HMR were on the shelves of American dealers.

I’m a traditionalist. I love my .270 Winchester, .30’06 Springfield and .22 LR. I try to buy American – especially when it comes to guns. With that said, I can appreciate quality and value, regardless of where it comes from. By 2006, I’d heard enough about the CZ 452 American and the .17 HMR to make up my mind.

The first thing I noticed about the CZ 452 American is the outstanding fit and finish of the external parts. From the seamlessly mated buttplate to the deep bluing of all metal surfaces, the American looks and feels like a rifle well above its price point.

The Turkish walnut stock is nicely figured and well finished. Although not as sharp or well done as what can be expected on a more expensive rifle, the checkering on the 452 is excellent for a rifle in its price range.

While the 452 American is clearly above its class in most areas, it does fall short in several others. It amazes me that such a well made rifle would have a cheap piece of sheet steel as a trigger guard. Obviously, this piece has no impact on the functionality of the rifle. Unfortunately, it does detract from the appearance. Although I can’t speak for others, I’d certainly be willing to pay a higher price for the American if it were fitted with a solid steel trigger guard.

Another issue I had with this rifle out of the box was the trigger. Although adjustable for weight of pull, the trigger on my American had a tremendous amount of creep. Luckily, due to the popularity of CZ rifles, there are several aftermarket options available to remedy this problem. Even though there were cheaper options offered, I chose to install a Rifle Basix Adjustable Trigger.

For a product that can be installed at the kitchen table in less than 30 minutes and is priced around $80, the improvement is significant. The trigger now breaks like glass at less than 3 lbs, rivaling triggers offered on high-end sporting rimfires like Kimber and Anschutz.

My final gripe with the 452 is the operation of the safety. Unlike most rifles, in which the safety is engaged by pulling back toward the shooter, the safety on the 452 is actually off when in the rear position. For a shooter who is used to a “forward to fire, back for safe” safety, this takes some getting used to and could possibly lead to an accident. In my opinion, CZ should change the operation of the safety to work in a manner consistent with the vast majority of other rifles. 

At the end of the day, no matter what a rifle looks like, it’s not going to leave the safe unless it shoots. As Col. Townsend Whelen so aptly put it, “only accurate rifles are interesting.” There’s no question my 452 American is interesting.

After two years of shooting every .17 HMR load available, I’m confident the 452 American can handle any small game chore it’s given out to the maximum point blank range of 150 yards – regardless of the ammunition used. With that said, my particular rifle definitely prefers Winchester Supreme 17 grain V-Max and Federal 17 grain V-Shok, grouping five shots of each consistently under 1-inch at 100 yards.

It’s important to note here that the American is designed to be a sporting rifle and not a varmint rifle. With its light, sporter-weight barrel, it tends to heat up pretty quickly which can negatively affect accuracy. If you’re looking for a rifle to handle a day of shooting over the local prairie dog town, I would suggest the CZ 452 Varmint. The Varmint has a similar American-style stock profile, but is fitted with a heavy barrel for the more intense shooting duties.

Although it’s not perfect, the CZ 452 American has been a favorite of mine since I purchased it.  In fact, I like the American so much I find myself comparing it to significantly higher priced rifles.  That may not be fair, but it speaks to the overall quality of this rifle.  Even with the addition of a new trigger, the American is priced $200-$300 less than comparable mid- to high-end rifles.   For this, I can readily accept its minor shortcomings.

With its classic good looks, tack-driving accuracy and excellent fit and finish, the 452 American is a great value anyone can appreciate.

© Copyright 2009 by the Western Rifleman. All rights reserved.

Published in: on February 9, 2009 at 9:46 pm  Comments (10)  
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://westernrifleman.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/cz-452-american/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

10 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Out of curiosity – how does the Anschutz compare? Can you provide a comparison?

  2. It’s really an apples to oranges comparison, Astronomy Guy. The Anschutz rimfires are high-end rifles with everything you’d expect of a rifle in that category – including the price. Even the base model 1517 is double the price of the CZ 452.

    The CZ is an excellent value and has a terrific reputation for accuracy. It isn’t going to have the out-of-the-box refinement of the Anschutz, but it’s not fair to expect it to.

    If you’re looking for a well-made, accurate rimfire you’ll be very happy with the CZ. If what you really want is an Anschutz, you’re not going to be happy unless you save up and buy an Anschutz…

    Thanks for reading – TWR

  3. What scope would you recommend, game only, 150 yrds max, prefer fixed power?

    thanks

  4. Thanks for reading, Dick. If I were to use a fixed power scope on my .17 HMR, I’d choose the Leupold FX-II 6x36mm. Currently, I have a Leupold VX II 2-7x33mm mounted on my CZ 452. Since my primary use for this rifle is rabbit hunting and varmint control (prairie dogs, ground hogs, etc…), and most shots are under 150 yards, I rarely find myself needing more than 6x or 7x power. One of the reasons I prefer the variable scope is I can lower the power to 2x for quick shots at rabbits at relatively close range, but have the higher power for shots at smaller game like praire dogs.

    If the Leupold is out of your price range, you could do very well with a Nikon, Burris or higher end Bushnell fixed power. Just remember, as the old saying goes… “you get what you pay for.” One of the reasons I continually find myself buying Leupold scopes is their resale value. Not only does the scope maintain it’s value, but it substantially increases the value of the rifle.

    Hope that helps – Thanks for reading, TWR

  5. I have been looking at CZ, Cooper and Anzchutz .17HMR rifles for small, squirrel size game.

    I don’t want to manually load each round so I’d like a magazine with at least 5 round.

    I’m also in need of a scope and I have two recommendations the Leupold VX III 4.5-14×40 with AO (gun shop recommended)and the Leupold Leupold VX3 6.5-20×40 EFR (Leupold recommended).

    I know very little about scopes and guns and so I am hoping that someone, like yourself, wouldn’t might giving me some independent advice.

    I really appreciate your help.

    Blessings,
    Mark

  6. Thanks for reading, Mark. You’re really looking at a wide spectrum of rifles when comparing a CZ to a Cooper or Anschutz. While CZ rifles are definitely at the higher end of the mid-range, it’s not really fair to compare them to an Anschutz or Cooper.

    Although it’s true that Anschutz has varying levels of refinement, even their entry-level rifles built on the 64 action are several hundred dollars more than the high-end CZ 453. Cooper, on the other hand, is generally thought of as a semi-custom to custom rifle manufacturer only. Cooper is also the only rifle of the three to be manufactured in America. Regardless of your feelings of country of origin, from a stylistic standpoint, the Cooper looks distinctly American, while the CZ and Anschutz have a more European styling.

    Each manufacturer offers a magazine-loaded repeater (since you don’t want a single-shot), although Anschutz and Cooper only offer 4-shot magazines, while CZ offers a 5-shot. In order to make this decision, you really need to decide how much you want to spend and which style of rifle you like best. I personally like the style of American sporters the best, and if money were no option, I’d choose a Cooper Classic. With that said, any of the three are excellent rifles and you probably won’t notice much difference in practical accuracy. The real difference will be in the overall fit, finish, and quality of components (including wood).

    As for the scopes, the VX3 line of scopes from Leupold are outstanding. Not only are the optics clear and bright, but a Leupold scope will add class and value to the rifle. I have to disagree with both the gun shop and Leupold, however, on the power of scope being recommended. Since your primary use for the rifle is small game, I’d recommend something in the 2-7x or 3-9x range. Leupold offers excellent scopes in both of those ranges and they’ll be significantly more useful for hunting squirrels and other small game. As an example, I currently have a Leupold VXII in 2-7x on my CZ 452 .17 HMR rifle. I hunt prairie dogs, rabbits, squirrels and various other small animals with this rifle and have never wished for more magnification. I can dial it up to 7x for longer shots, but it also allows me to dial it down to 2x for hunting things like rabbits which may require a wider field of view for quick shots.

    If you’d like a more detailed recommendation on one of these manufactures please let me know. Hope this helps – Thanks for reading. TWR

  7. I have purchased this rifle but am stuck on scopes to get. I do some small game hunting but I also do a some long range accuracy shotting at the range so is there a scope that can compensate for both and if not are there two scopes that could be recommended.

    Thanks, Jon.

  8. Thanks for reading, Jon. I’m assuming you purchased the CZ 452 in .17 HMR and not .22 LR. Considering your needs, I would recommend the Leupold VX-II 3-9×33 EFR. This scope is designed specifically for rimfire rifles with a fine duplex reticle (very useful for small game hunting and small targets) and an adjustable objective so that you can focus parallax to whatever distance needed (far more useful in long range accuracy shooting where the distance is known rather than hunting). This scope is not cheap at around $400, but it’s well worth the money and will retain its value. Leupold has an industry leading worry free return policy regardless if you’re the original owner. This makes their resale value very high because potential buyers will know they can send it off to Leupold if anything is wrong and they won’t have to pay for it. They’re also very trim and compact scopes that would look excellent on the CZ 452. I hope this helps, good luck – TWR.

  9. I’ve been using a 3-9 pwer Tasco scope for the last 6 months and a variable scope is definately the go for shooting game at both close and far distances, especially when looking for a head shot. That being said, I have found this rifle to be somewhat not powerful enough if not going for the headshot for anything bigger than small game like ducks and rabbits. If like me you try using it for larger game like kangeroos where I’m from, a clean headshot or no shot at all.

    Cameron.

  10. I abolutly love my cz american i bought a few days ago . I put my old simmons scope on it and it shoots better than my brothers marlin 17 hmr and both have 1:9 twist ratio. And the marlin was about 100 bucks more expensive than mine.


Leave a comment